Population Covered By The Guidance
This pathway provides guidance on the imaging investigation of an adult patient with a mediastinal mass
Lead Researcher: Dr Kieran Kusel
Experts & Contributors: Dr Yuranga Weerakkody, Clin Prof Richard Mendelson
Date reviewed: February 2019 and August 2024
Date Published: September 2025
-
There are a wide range of differential diagnoses for mediastinal masses
-
Initial radiological investigation usually comprises of plain film chest radiography (PA and lateral) followed by a CT scan of the chest with contrast
-
It is helpful to compartmentalise the mediastinum into prevascular (anterior), visceral (middle), and paravertebral (posterior) compartments
-
Based on the location of the mass and CT characteristics a likely diagnosis can often be made
-
In some cases, further assessment with MRI, PET/CT, endoscopy, and/or biopsy for tissue diagnosis is required to plan further management
Date of literature search: February 2019 and August 2024
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- Muniappan A. Assessment of mediastinal mass. In: BMJ Best Practice [Internet]. 2018 2019 Feb 21]:[(Review article) p.]. Available from: https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/998.
- Thacker PG, Mahani MG, Heider A, Lee EY. Imaging Evaluation of Mediastinal Masses in Children and Adults: Practical Diagnostic Approach Based on A New Classification System. Journal of thoracic imaging. 2015;30(4):247-67 (Review article).
- Laurent F, Latrabe V, Lecesne R, Zennaro H, Airaud JY, Rauturier JF, et al. Mediastinal masses: diagnostic approach. 1998;8(7):1148-59 (Review article).
- Juanpere S, Canete N, Ortuno P, Martinez S, Sanchez G, Bernado L. A diagnostic approach to the mediastinal masses. Insights into imaging. 2013;4(1):29-52.
- Carter BW, Okumura M, Detterbeck FC, Marom EM. Approaching the patient with an anterior mediastinal mass: a guide for radiologists. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(9 Suppl 2):S110-8 (Review article).
- Wright MD, Cameron D., Mathisen MD, Douglas J. %J World Journal of Surgery. Mediastinal Tumors: Diagnosis and Treatment. 2001;25(2):204-9 (Review article).
- Hammer MM, Miskin N, Madan R, Hunsaker AR. Predictive Features for Anterior Mediastinal Mass Diagnoses. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2019;43(1):98-103 (Level III evidence).
- Jiao D, Huang K, Wu G, Wang Y, Han X. Flat detector cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of mediastinal lesions: preliminary experience. La Radiologia medica. 2016;121(10):769-79 (Level III evidence).
- Watanabe T, Shimomura H, Mutoh T, Saito R, Goto R, Yamada T, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a clinical diagnostic tool for anterior mediastinal tumors. Surgery today. 2019;49(2):143-9 (Level III evidence).
- Hayes SA, Plodkowski AJ, Ginsberg MS. Imaging of thoracic cavity tumors. Surgical oncology clinics of North America. 2014;23(4):709-33 (Review article).
- Ackman JB. MR Imaging of Mediastinal Masses. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America. 2015;23(2):141-64 (Review article).
- Carter BW. International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group Model of Mediastinal Compartments. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(2):149-53.
- Azizad S, Sannananja B, Restrepo CS. Solid Tumors of the Mediastinum in Adults. Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR. 2016;37(3):196-211 (Review article).
- Kim Y, Lee KS, Yoo JH, Rhee C, Koo H, Han J, et al. Middle mediastinal lesions: imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2000;35(1):30-8.
- Roberts AS, Shetty AS, Mellnick VM, Pickhardt PJ, Bhalla S, Menias CO. Extramedullary haematopoiesis: radiological imaging features. Clin Radiol. 2016;71(9):807-14 (Review article).
- Strollo DC, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Jett JR. Primary mediastinal tumors: part II. Tumors of the middle and posterior mediastinum. Chest. 1997;112(5):1344-57.
- Takahashi K, Al-Janabi NJ. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of mediastinal tumors. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2010;32(6):1325-39 (Review article).
- McErlean A, Huang J, Zabor EC, Moskowitz CS, Ginsberg MS. Distinguishing benign thymic lesions from early-stage thymic malignancies on computed tomography. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(7):967-73 (Level III evidence).
- Tomiyama N, Honda O, Tsubamoto M, Inoue A, Sumikawa H, Kuriyama K, et al. Anterior mediastinal tumors: diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69(2):280-8 (Level III evidence).
- Lee SH, Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Hong YJ, Choi BW. Additional value of dual-energy CT to differentiate between benign and malignant mediastinal tumors: an initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(11):2043-9 (Level II evidence).
- Carter BW, Benveniste MF, Truong MT, Marom EM. State of the Art: MR Imaging of Thymoma. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America. 2015;23(2):165-77 (Review article).
- Madan R, Ratanaprasatporn L, Ratanaprasatporn L, Carter BW, Ackman JB. Cystic mediastinal masses and the role of MRI. Clinical imaging. 2018;50:68-77 (Reivew article).
- Marom EM. Imaging thymoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(10 Suppl 4):S296-303 (Review article).
- Ong CC, Teo LL. Imaging of anterior mediastinal tumours. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society. 2012;12:506-15 (Review article).
- Usuda K, Maeda S, Motono N, Ueno M, Tanaka M, Machida Y, et al. Diffusion Weighted Imaging Can Distinguish Benign from Malignant Mediastinal Tumors and Mass Lesions: Comparison with Positron Emission Tomography. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2015;16(15):6469-75 (Level III evidence).
- Carter BW, Betancourt SL, Benveniste MF. MR Imaging of Mediastinal Masses. Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI. 2017;26(4):153-65.
- Vargas D, Suby-Long T, Restrepo CS. Cystic Lesions of the Mediastinum. Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR. 2016;37(3):212-22 (Review article).
- Shin KE, Yi CA, Kim TS, Lee HY, Choi YS, Kim HK, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for distinguishing non-neoplastic cysts from solid masses in the mediastinum: problem-solving in mediastinal masses of indeterminate internal characteristics on CT. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(3):677-84 (Level III evidence).
- Carter BW, Lichtenberger JP, 3rd, Benveniste MF. MR Imaging of Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms. Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI. 2018;27(2):65-71 (Review article).
- Marom EM. Advances in thymoma imaging. Journal of thoracic imaging. 2013;28(2):69-80; quiz 1-3 (Review article).
- Seki S, Koyama H, Ohno Y, Nishio M, Takenaka D, Maniwa Y, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging vs. multi-detector row CT: Direct comparison of capability for assessment of management needs for anterior mediastinal solitary tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(5):835-42 (Level III evidence).
- Tondo F, Saponaro A, Stecco A, Lombardi M, Casadio C, Carriero A. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the chest-mediastinum. La Radiologia medica. 2011;116(5):720-33 (Level III evidence).
- Razek AA, Elmorsy A, Elshafey M, Elhadedy T, Hamza O. Assessment of mediastinal tumors with diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MRI. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2009;30(3):535-40 (Level II evidence).
- Kosucu P, Tekinbas C, Erol M, Sari A, Kavgaci H, Oztuna F, et al. Mediastinal lymph nodes: assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2009;30(2):292-7 (Level II evidence).
- Heeger AP, Ackman JB. Added Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Mediastinal Lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(2):251-77.
- Nguyen ET, Bayanati H, Bilawich AM, Tijmes FS, Lim R, Harris S, et al. Canadian Society of Thoracic Radiology/Canadian Association of Radiologists Clinical Practice Guidance for Non-Vascular Thoracic MRI. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;72(4):831-45.
- Nakazono T, Yamaguchi K, Egashira R, Iyadomi M, Fujiki K, Takayanagi S, et al. MRI Findings and Differential Diagnosis of Anterior Mediastinal Solid Tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2023;22(4):415-33.
- Proli C, De Sousa P, Jordan S, Anikin V, Devaraj A, Love SM, et al. A diagnostic cohort study on the accuracy of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT for evaluation of malignancy in anterior mediastinal lesions: the DECiMaL study. BMJ open. 2018;8(2):e019471 (Level III evidence).
- Kitami A, Sano F, Ohashi S, Suzuki K, Uematsu S, Suzuki T, et al. The Usefulness of Positron-Emission Tomography Findings in the Management of Anterior Mediastinal Tumors. Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia. 2017;23(1):26-30 (Level III evidence).
- Shinya T, Tanaka T, Soh J, Matsushita T, Sato S, Toyooka S, et al. Diagnostic Value of Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT and Chest CT for the Prediction of Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms. Acta medica Okayama. 2017;71(2):105-12 (Level III evidence).
- Benveniste MF, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Sabloff BS, Moran CA, Swisher SG, Marom EM. Role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of thymoma. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2011;31(7):1847-61; discussion 61-3 (Review article).
- Gupta N, Gill H, Graeber G, Bishop H, Hurst J, Stephens T. Dynamic positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant lung/mediastinal lesions. Chest. 1998;114(4):1105-11.
- Bangerter M, Kotzerke J, Griesshammer M, Elsner K, Reske SN, Bergmann L. Positron emission tomography with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma in the chest. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 1999;38(6):799-804.
- Sharma P, Jha V, Kumar N, Kumar R, Mandal A. Clinicopathological Analysis of Mediastinal Masses: A Mixed Bag of Non-Neoplastic and Neoplastic Etiologies. Turk patoloji dergisi. 2017;33(1):37-46 (Level III evidence).
- Petranovic M, Gilman MD, Muniappan A, Hasserjian RP, Digumarthy SR, Muse VV, et al. Diagnostic Yield of CT-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy for Diagnosis of Anterior Mediastinal Masses. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2015;205(4):774-9 (Level III evidence).
- Santos RSD, Jacomelli M, Franceschini JP, Suzuki I, Costa ADS, Jr., Shiang C, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2018;16(2):eAO4094 (Level III evidence).
- Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, Fujiwara T, Yoshino I, Keshavjee S. Utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses of unknown etiology. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2011;91(3):831-6.
- Yi D, Feng M, Wen Ping W, Zheng Biao J, Fan PL. Contrast-enhanced US-guided percutaneous biopsy of anterior mediastinal lesions. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2017;23(1):43-8 (Level III evidence).
- Kim H, Park CM, Lee SM, Goo JM. C-Arm Cone-Beam CT Virtual Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Mediastinal Mass Biopsy: Diagnostic Accuracy and Complications. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(12):3508-17 (Level III evidence).
- de Margerie-Mellon C, de Bazelaire C, Amorim S, Brice P, Tazi A, Briere J, et al. Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Computed Tomography-guided Mediastinal Core Needle Biopsies. Journal of thoracic imaging. 2015;30(5):319-27 (Level III evidence).
- Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Matsui Y, Fujiwara H, Sakurai J, Masaoka Y, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided core needle biopsy of anterior mediastinal masses. Diagnostic and interventional imaging. 2018;99(2):91-7 (Level III evidence).
- Lee HN, Yun SJ, Kim JI, Ryu CW. Diagnostic outcome and safety of CT-guided core needle biopsy for mediastinal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(1):588-99.
- Bolton WD, Johnson R, Banks E, Hutcheson S, Wall W, Stephenson J. Utility and accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound as a diagnostic and staging tool for the evaluation of mediastinal adenopathy. Surgical endoscopy. 2013;27(4):1119-23 (Level III evidence).
- Ernst A, Anantham D, Eberhardt R, Krasnik M, Herth FJ. Diagnosis of mediastinal adenopathy-real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided needle aspiration versus mediastinoscopy. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3(6):577-82.
- Labarca G, Sierra-Ruiz M, Kheir F, Folch E, Majid A, Mehta HJ, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in Lymphoma. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(11):1432-9.
- Schwalk AJ, Niroula A, Schimmel M. What is new in mediastinal staging? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2024;30(1):25-34.
- Yasufuku K, Pierre A, Darling G, de Perrot M, Waddell T, Johnston M, et al. A prospective controlled trial of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with mediastinoscopy for mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1393-400.e1.
- Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, Motoori K, Sekine Y, Shibuya K, Hiroshima K, et al. Comparison of endobronchial ultrasound, positron emission tomography, and CT for lymph node staging of lung cancer. Chest. 2006;130(3):710-8.
- Lin LF, Huang PT, Tsai MH, Chen TM, Ho KS. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in lung and mediastinal lesions. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA. 2010;73(10):523-9 (Level III evidence).
- Ardengh JC, Bammann RH, Giovani M, Venco F, Parada AA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies for mediastinal lesions and lymph node diagnosis and staging. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(9):1579-83 (Level III evidence).
- Nguyen TQ, Kalade A, Prasad S, Desmond P, Wright G, Hart D, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of mediastinal lesions. ANZ journal of surgery. 2011;81(1-2):75-8 (Level III evidence).
- Zeppa P, Barra E, Napolitano V, Cozzolino I, Troncone G, Picardi M, et al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in lymph nodal and mediastinal lesions: a multicenter experience. Diagnostic cytopathology. 2011;39(10):723-9 (Level III evidence).
- Puli SR, Batapati Krishna Reddy J, Bechtold ML, Ibdah JA, Antillon D, Singh S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: it's accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World journal of gastroenterology. 2008;14(19):3028-37.
- Encinas de la Iglesia J, Corral de la Calle MA, Fernandez Perez GC, Ruano Perez R, Alvarez Delgado A. Esophageal cancer: anatomic particularities, staging, and imaging techniques. Radiologia. 2016;58(5):352-65 (Review article).
- Holloway BJ, Rosewarne D, Jones RG. Imaging of thoracic aortic disease. The British journal of radiology. 2011;84 Spec No 3(Spec Iss 3):S338-54 (Review article).
- Di Cesare E, Splendiani A, Barile A, Squillaci E, Di Cesare A, Brunese L, et al. CT and MR imaging of the thoracic aorta. Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland). 2016;11(1):143-51 (Review article).
- Tower-Rader A, Kwon D. Pericardial Masses, Cysts and Diverticula: A Comprehensive Review Using Multimodality Imaging. Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2017;59(4):389-97 (Review article).
- Zhou WW, Wang HW, Liu NN, Li JJ, Yuan W, Zhao R, et al. Diagnosis of malignancy of adult mediastinal tumors by conventional and transesophageal echocardiography. Chinese medical journal. 2015;128(8):1047-51 (Level II evidence).
- Evison M, Robinson SD, Sharman A, Datta S, Rammohan K, Duerden R, et al. Making an accurate diagnosis of anterior mediastinal lesions: a proposal for a new diagnostic algorithm from the BTOG Thymic Malignancies Special Interest Group. Clin Radiol. 2024;79(6):404-12.
- Marx A, Chan JKC, Chalabreysse L, Dacic S, Detterbeck F, French CA, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Thymus and Mediastinum: What Is New in Thymic Epithelial, Germ Cell, and Mesenchymal Tumors? J Thorac Oncol. 2022;17(2):200-13.
- Gentili F, Pelini V, Lucii G, Luzzi L, Mazzei FG, Fausto A, et al. Update in diagnostic imaging of the thymus and anterior mediastinal masses. Gland Surg. 2019;8(Suppl 3):S188-s207.
- Taka M, Kobayashi S, Mizutomi K, Inoue D, Takamatsu S, Gabata T, et al. Diagnostic approach for mediastinal masses with radiopathological correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2023;162:110767.
- Garrana SH, Rosado-de-Christenson ML. Imaging of the Anterior/Prevascular Mediastinum. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(2):155-68.
- Carter BW, Lichtenberger JP, 3rd. Imaging of the Posterior/Paravertebral Mediastinum. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(2):243-9.
- Bourgouin PP, Madan R. Imaging of the Middle and Visceral Mediastinum. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021;59(2):193-204.
- Ackman JB, Chung JH, Walker CM, Bang TJ, Carter BW, Hobbs SB, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Mediastinal Masses. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(5s):S37-s51.
Pathway User Guide
Yellow Boxes Denotes extra information. Some contain single or multiple white sub-boxes, click a white box to reveal detailed information in a pop-up.
White Boxes: Denotes standard pathway steps. (If inside a yellow box, they open a specific pop-up).
Zoom & Pan Controls: Use + / − or the slider to zoom. Reset returns to default. Tick Panning to drag the diagram when zoomed.
Blue “View Full Screen” Button: Opens the whole diagram in a large, full-screen pop-up window. Use Close to exit.
The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.
| SYMBOL | RRL | EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE |
|---|---|---|
| None | 0 | |
| Minimal | < 1 millisieverts | |
| Low | 1-5 mSv | |
| Medium | 5-10 mSv | |
| High | >10 mSv |
Disclaimer
Status Of Recommendations Each pathway is designed to assist clinicians in situations when faced with a large array of possible diagnostic tests and examinations. However, it is recognised that diagnostic practice may differ from a particular pathway depending on local availability of equipment and expertise, as well as the experience of individual clinicians. Therefore each pathway is neither a rigid set of rules, nor a substitute for clinical assessment, and individual patient circumstances should always be considered.
Spotted an error or outdated info? Click to tell us.
Suspected Mediastinal Mass
Suspected Mediastinal Mass
There are a wide range of differential diagnoses for mediastinal masses. Imaging plays an important role in diagnosis and will usually comprise a minimum of plain chest radiography and computed tomography
-
The mediastinum is the thoracic space between the visceral pleura of the lungs, from the thoracic inlet to the diaphragm. It is bordered anteriorly by the sternum and posteriorly by the vertebral column and contains the heart, great vessels, trachea, oesophagus, thymus gland, lymphatic tissue and nerves. Masses may arise from any of these structures
-
Most patients with mediastinal masses are asymptomatic, although symptoms are more commonly experienced in patients with malignant masses (80-90% compared with 46% in patients with benign masses).
-
83% of incidentally discovered masses are benign
-
The most frequent lesions encountered in the mediastinum in adults are primary thymic neoplasms, thyroid masses and lymphoma
-
Imaging plays an essential role in the investigation of mediastinal masses. Some tumours of the mediastinum can be diagnosed based on imaging alone, and others may require biopsy and histopathological diagnosis
-
Benign appearing tumours of the mediastinum are usually resected for cure - for example thymomas. Malignant appearing lesions usually require biopsy in the first instance and may be treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy– for example lymphomas and germ cell tumours
-
The Thymic Malignancy Interest Group have developed a CT-based division of the mediastinum into three compartments
-
Prevascular - includes all structures anterior to the pericardium and proximal ascending aorta
-
Visceral - includes all major mediastinal visceral structures extending from anterior pericardium to a vertical line drawn 1 cm posterior to the anterior margin of the spine
-
Paravertebral - includes all mediastinal structures posterior to this vertical line
-
The Table below lists mediastinal lesions based on where they are most commonly found
|
Anterior/Prevascular compartment |
Middle/Visceral compartment |
Posterior/Paravertebral compartment |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
-
It is important to note that some diseases, however, do not occur exclusively in one compartment and can spread from one compartment to another. Compartments are not separated by fascial planes and communicate freely with one another
-
Masses are found to be malignant in 60% of anterior mediastinal masses, 30% of middle mediastinal masses and 15% of posterior mediastinal masses
Plain Chest Radiograph (PA & lateral)
Plain Chest Radiograph (PA & lateral)
An erect posteroanterior and lateral chest radiograph taken after a good inspiratory effort are required to assess the presence and location of a mediastinal mass
-
A plain chest radiograph represents the first imaging investigation in the majority of cases. Often a mediastinal mass will be an incidental finding on chest radiography performed for other reasons
-
Deformation of mediastinal contours and lines, and/or displacement of normal structures can be seen
-
From chest radiography the location (anterior, middle, or posterior mediastinum) and basic characteristics of the mass can often be established. These findings, in conjunction with the clinical history and patient demographics, can provide a limited differential diagnosis
Computed Tomography (CT)
Computed Tomography (CT)
Imaging modality of choice for evaluation of a suspected mediastinal mass
-
CT with IV contrast is the most important imaging investigation in the evaluation of a mediastinal mass
-
May be the only imaging investigation required before deciding on further management
-
Generally, has a high accuracy in determining size, characteristics (solid or cystic), content (calcium, fat or necrotic tissue), location, and adjacent organ involvement of a mediastinal mass
-
Traditionally the mediastinum has been compartmentalised into anterior, middle, and posterior compartments based on lateral radiograph anatomy (Felson’s classification). More recently the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group developed a CT-based division of the mediastinum into three compartments:
-
Prevascular - includes all structures anterior to the pericardium and proximal ascending aorta
-
Visceral - includes all major mediastinal visceral structures extending from anterior pericardium to a vertical line drawn 1 cm posterior to the anterior margin of the spine
-
Paravertebral - includes all mediastinal structures posterior to this vertical line
-
In conjunction with the patient’s demographics and symptoms, the location and characteristics of the mediastinal mass on CT may be diagnostic (50-60% of cases) or at least focus the differential diagnosis
-
Some diseases, however, do not occur exclusively in one compartment and can spread from one compartment to another. Compartments are not separated by fascial planes and communicate freely with one another
-
Masses are found to be malignant in 60% of anterior mediastinal masses, 30% of middle mediastinal masses and 15% of posterior mediastinal masses
-
The table below lists mediastinal lesions based on where they are most commonly found:
|
Anterior/Prevascular compartment |
Middle/Visceral compartment |
Posterior/Paravertebral compartment |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
-
Where available, dual energy CT may be a helpful complementary tool to differentiate between benign and malignant mediastinal tumours when conventional contrast CT is inconclusive
-
One study which analysed 127 anterior mediastinal masses found that CT was equal or superior to MRI in the diagnosis of lesions of various aetiologies apart from thymic cysts – correctly diagnosing the lesion in 61% compared with 56% of cases
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Adjunctive imaging modality for some lesions which are indeterminate or incompletely characterised by CT. Can better assess cystic masses and determine chest wall, intraspinal and cardiac/vascular invasion. Recommended for masses in the posterior mediastinum
-
Although there is no consensus for its routine use, MRI is an important adjunctive imaging modality when a lesion is indeterminate or incompletely characterised by CT
-
MRI is superior to CT in assessing chest wall invasion, neural foramen involvement or spinal canal invasion, and cardiac/vascular invasion. It is therefore recommended for all posterior mediastinal masses
-
MRI is superior to CT to distinguish cystic from solid masses, discern cystic/necrotic components within solid masses, and discern thymic hyperplasia from thymic tumours
-
MRI is also useful in patients with contraindications to contrast-enhanced CT
-
Some studies have investigated the ability of MRI to distinguish benign from malignant mediastinal tumours and lymph nodes. Although there is no firm consensus for its routine use, these studies have all shown that MRI can differentiate between benign and malignant lesions in the majority of cases. This may be helpful in those patients who are not fit for more invasive biopsy techniques
-
MRI can aid diagnosis of indeterminate mediastinal lesions on CXR and CT
-
The MRI techniques and imaging findings in non-vascular thoracic MRI have been reviewed in recent Canadian guidelines
-
The MRI appearances of anterior compartment lesions have been reviewed by Nakazono
Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)
Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)
Largely used as an adjunct to CT scanning in the evaluation of a mediastinal mass. Important for tumour staging and for monitoring treatment response in suspected lymphoma
-
Although there is no current consensus recommending its routine use, a number of small studies have found that PET/CT can be useful to distinguish between benign and malignant neoplasms in the anterior mediastinum. This may be particularly useful in patients who are in a poor physical condition for obtaining a pathological diagnosis and when the diagnosis remains uncertain after other imaging modalities have been performed
-
One retrospective study of 94 patients found a significantly higher uptake of FDG in thymic cancer compared with thymoma
-
A separate multicentre retrospective study with 134 patients found that PET/CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 58% to correctly classify an anterior mediastinal mass as malignant. The positive and negative predictive values were 90% and 42% respectively. The authors of this study concluded that PET/CT was therefore moderately useful to rule out the diagnosis of malignancy when the test result was negative, but unable to rule in the diagnosis of malignancy when the result was positive
-
PET/CT is important for tumour staging and for monitoring treatment response in lymphoma
Biopsy and Tissue Diagnosis
Biopsy and Tissue Diagnosis
A tissue diagnosis is often required for medical and/or surgical planning. The location of the mass will determine how best to obtain a sample and this may be via imaging guided percutaneous biopsy, endoscopic or endobronchial ultrasound guided biopsy, or via more invasive surgical techniques
to
(depending on the imaging modality used for the biopsy)
-
When diagnosis remains uncertain, fine needle aspiration or core biopsy is usually necessary to guide subsequent surgical and/or medical treatment
-
Access to the mediastinum can pose significant technical challenges. There are a number of modalities which can be used to obtain a pathological diagnosis, each with its advantages and limitations
Ultrasound or CT-guided percutaneous biopsy
-
Particularly useful for anterior mediastinal masses
-
Minimally invasive and cost-effective, can be performed under local anaesthesia or with conscious sedation
-
Diagnostic success rates for ultrasound guided percutaneous biopsy in anterior mediastinal lesions range from 71 to 100% . Use of contrast enhanced ultrasound has been trialled and is thought to increase diagnostic accuracy of biopsies - tumour tissue and necrotic tissue are better identified based on microvascularity and blood flow which improves one’s ability to obtain adequate and representative specimens
-
Overall CT-guided mediastinal lesion biopsy has a diagnostic yield sensitivity of 77-97.4%
-
A recent systematic review/meta-analysis reported the pooled diagnostic yield and accuracy of core needle biopsy of mediastinal masses to be 92% and 94%, respectively.
-
The same study reported a total complication rate of 13% and major complication rate of 2%.
-
The authors recommend 20G core biopsies to improve diagnostic outcomes and decrease complication rates.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy
-
A minimally invasive, relatively low risk technique for diagnosis of lymphadenopathies and/or mediastinal masses
-
Recommended for indeterminate paratracheal lesions
-
Has a reported diagnostic yield sensitivity between 84-96%
-
Has the capability to access lymph nodes traditionally sampled by mediastinoscopy including the paratracheal, subcarinal, hilar and parenchymal lymph node stations
-
Although EBUS-guided aspiration biopsy has moderately good sensitivity in the diagnosis of metastatic disease in the context of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , it is somewhat less sensitive for lymphoproliferative disease . However, specificity is high in both contexts.
-
EBUS is considered a first line examination for invasive mediastinal evaluation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
-
EBUS- guided transbronchial needle aspiration is highly sensitive and specific for mediastinal staging in NSCCL and small cell carcinoma of the lung is effective in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses of unknown aetiology .
-
EBUS-guided intranodal forceps and cryobiopsy may provide more optimal specimens for patients with benign disease such as sarcoidosis and in those with lymphoproliferative disease .
Endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy
-
A minimally invasive, relatively low risk technique for diagnosis of lymphadenopathies and/or mediastinal masses
-
Recommended for indeterminate paraoesophageal lesions
-
Sensitivity and specificity reported to be 80-93% and 100% respectively
-
Endoscopic ultrasound allows better access to the posterior/inferior mediastinum, including to sub-carinal and paraoesophageal lymph nodes
Surgical mediastinoscopy/mediastinotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
-
Mediastinoscopy is a commonly used approach requiring general anaesthesia. An incision is made just above the manubrium and the scope passed along the pretracheal plane into the mediastinum. There is a reported 2.5% risk of pneumothorax and haemorrhage (61)
-
Mediastinotomy is typically performed for anterior mediastinal masses or masses within the aortopulmonary window. A small transverse parasternal incision is made to give excellent exposure. It has a high diagnostic yield but it is an invasive procedure requiring general anaesthesia
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) allows excellent exposure of all compartments of the mediastinum for diagnostic biopsy or therapeutic excision and can accurately determine local invasion or intrapleural metastatic spread. Procedures which were previously performed using an open technique can now be performed via VATS including thymectomy, duplication cyst excision, pericardial cyst excision and posterior mediastinal mass resection
Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)
Helpful to further assess some mediastinal cysts and masses in close approximation to the oesophagus. Can assess invasion through and relationship to the oesophageal wall and depth of infiltration. Permits concurrent fine needle aspiration biopsy if needed
-
Accurate in the diagnosis of mediastinal cysts and can facilitate diagnostic/therapeutic aspiration
-
Endoscopic ultrasound can be used to differentiate between oesophageal intramural or extramural masses and delineate the relation of the lesion to surrounding structures
-
Concurrent FNA can be performed for tissue diagnosis
-
For oesophageal tumours, endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound provides the most accurate imaging modality to assess depth of tumour infiltration in the wall
Bronchoscopy and Endobronchial ultrasound
Bronchoscopy and Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)
To assess the location and degree of tracheal invasion. Biopsy can be performed for a tissue diagnosis for paratracheal masses
-
To assess the location and extent of a central tumour when it is abutting the trachea or central bronchi as well as an accurate assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes
-
Endobronchial ultrasound can help to establish the degree of tracheal invasion
-
It has capability to access lymph nodes traditionally sampled by mediastinoscopy including paratracheal, subcarinal, hilar and parenchymal lymph node stations
CT Angiogram or MR Angiogram
CT Angiogram or MR Angiogram
Useful in the evaluation of aortic aneurysms and dissections
CT MRI
-
Aortic dissection and associated vascular abnormalities can be visualised. True and false lumens, intimal flap, aortic regurgitation and coronary arteries can be visualised to help in operative planning
-
CT angiogram is the most commonly used investigation to evaluate the aorta
-
MR angiography is particularly useful in imaging of younger patients with aortic pathology
Echocardiography
Echocardiography
Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography are particularly useful in assessing pericardial disease or when there is suspected invasion by a mass into the pericardium or heart. Can also determine the haemodynamic consequences of compression or possible obstruction of the great vessels from a mediastinal mass
-
Both transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography have been used to assess masses within the mediastinum, and are particularly useful in assessing pericardial disease or when there is suspected invasion by a mass into the pericardium or heart
-
Transoesophageal echocardiography is more invasive but can provide additional details (mass size, composition, associated lymph nodes and the anatomic relation of the mass to other structures) which can be used in conjunction with cross-sectional imaging in pre-operative planning
-
It can also assess haemodynamic consequences of compression, possible obstruction of the great vessels and involvement of the heart cavities
Barium swallow
Barium swallow
Assesses the relationship of an oesophageal cyst to the oesophagus proper and determines whether there is a communication with the lumen. Can also assess for extrinsic compression of the oesophagus from a mediastinal mass
-
Assesses the relationship of an oesophageal cyst to the oesophagus proper and determines whether there is a communication with the lumen
-
Can also assess for extrinsic compression of the oesophagus from a mediastinal mass or stricturing from an oesophageal mass
Thymic lesions
Thymic lesions range from the benign (thymic remnant, thymic hyperplasia and thymic cysts) to localised thymomas to more aggressive malignancy (thymic carcinoma, lymphoma and germ cell tumours)
-
Thymic lesions range from the benign (thymic remnant, thymic hyperplasia and thymic cysts) to localised thymomas to more aggressive malignancy (thymic carcinoma, lymphoma and germ cell tumours).
-
The classification of thymic epithelial, germ cell, and mesenchymal tumours has been recently (2021) updated by WHO .
-
Non-epithelial lesions of the thymus include thymic lymphomas, thymic carcinoids, thymic germ cell tumors, and thymic lipomas .
-
A diagnostic algorithm for suspected thymic lesions (and their imaging characteristics) has been recently proposed by the BTOG Thymic Malignancies Special Interest Group and is summarised below, based on initial CT findings.
-
Thymic hyperplasia is often seen in the context of an acute illness, cancer treatment or a connective tissue disease.
-
If there is doubt regarding the diagnosis of thymic hyperplasia, contrast-enhanced MRI and chemical shift MRI are advised
-
If thymic cyst is suspected, contrast-enhanced MRI is recommended.
-
If there are atypical features present within the cyst on MRI, further management including discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting and possible minimally invasive thymectomy may be required
-
Suspected early stage/localised thymoma: minimally invasive thymectomy if appropriate after discussion multidisciplinary meeting. An alternative may be surveillance with portal venous phase post-contrast CT.
-
Suspected more aggressive/higher stage malignancy: PET-CT and biopsy
Most likely diagnosis based on location, CT characteristics, patient demographics and clinical picture
-
The diagnosis can often be made on the clinical picture, the patient’s demographics and the CT appearance.
-
The imaging characteristics of the various pathological entities have been recently reviewed by Taka et al and by Gentili et al .
-
The MRI appearances of anterior compartment lesions have been reviewed by Nakazono
-
The imaging modalities (CT, MRI, PET-CT) of use in the various mediastinal compartments and their related pathologies have been reviewed in recent articles
