Population Covered By The Guidance
This pathway provides guidance on the imaging of adult patients with suspected osteoporosis.
Lead Researcher: Manusha Ratnayake
Experts & Contributors: Jonathon Beilin, Richard Mendelson, Karen Rothacker
Editorial Panel: Core membership
Link to Editorial Panel
Date reviewed: December 2014
Date Published: March 2015
- Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and a consequent increase in the risk of fracture
- It is an important public health issue that is often under-recognised in the community until a disabling fracture occurs
- There are several indications for testing of bone mineral density, as a surrogate marker of osteoporosis
- DEXA is currently the favoured modality for determining bone mineral density
- The World Health Organisation has developed strict criteria that determines eligibility for osteoporotic treatment
- Several pharmacological treatments are available that effectively treat osteoporosis and prevent further loss of bone density
- In patients with established osteoporosis, the institution of an appropriate anti-osteoporotic pharmaceutical regime reduces subsequent fracture risk by 50 percent and also reduces premature mortality 19
Date of literature search: November 2014
The search methodology is available on request. Email
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- Osteoporosis Australia. Bone density testing in general practice. [www.osteoporosis.org.au]. [cited 2014 December 2]. View the reference
- Hazes JM, Woolf AD. The bone and joint decade 2000-2010. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):1-3. (Editorial). View the reference
- Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996;312(7041):1254-9. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- O'Neill S, MacLennan A, Bass S, et al. Guidelines for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis for GPs. Aust Fam Physician. 2004;33(11):910-9. (Review article). View the reference
- Writing guidelines for the ISCD position development conference. Indications and reporting for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7(1):37-44. (Guideline). View the reference
- Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:368-81. (Review article). View the reference
- Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post menopausal osteoporosis: a report of WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129. (WHO technical series 843). View the reference
- Australian Government: Department of Health and Ageing. Medicare Benefits Schedule Online. [www.mbsonline.gov.au]. [updated 2013 November 5; cited 2014 December 2]. View the reference
- Genant HK. Current State of bone densitometry for osteoporosis. Radiographics. 1998;18(4):913-8. (Review article). View the reference
- Osteoporosis Australia. Prevent the next fracture - a guide for GPs. 2nd Edn. 2008.
- Center J, Bliuc D, Nguyen T, et al. Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA. 2007;297(4):387-94. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen, et al. Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(3):190-5. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Khaw K, Reeve J, Luben R, et al. Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet. 2004;363(9404):197-202. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Nayak S, Olkin I, Liu H, et al. Meta-analysis: accuracy of quantitative ultrasound for identifying patients with osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(11):832-41. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Marlin F, Lopez-Bastida J, Diez-Perez A, et al. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effective analysis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004;74(3):277-83. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- McCauley E, Mackie A, Elliot D, et al. Heel bone densitometry: device specific thresholds for the assessment of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol. 2006;79(942):464-7. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Boehm H, Link T. Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2004;2(2):41-6. (Review article). View the reference
- Bliuc D, Alarkawi D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014. (in publication) (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Selecki Y, Eisman JA. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures: a practical approach. MedicineToday. 2014;15(11):18-27. (Review article). View the reference
- Nanes MS, Kallen CB. Osteoporosis.. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44(6):439-50. (Review article). View the reference
- Blake GM, Fogelman I. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(982):509-17. (Review article). View the reference
Pathway User Guide
Yellow Boxes Denotes extra information. Some contain single or multiple white sub-boxes, click a white box to reveal detailed information in a pop-up.
White Boxes: Denotes standard pathway steps. (If inside a yellow box, they open a specific pop-up).
Zoom & Pan Controls: Use + / − or the slider to zoom. Reset returns to default. Tick Panning to drag the diagram when zoomed.
Blue “View Full Screen” Button: Opens the whole diagram in a large, full-screen pop-up window. Use Close to exit.
The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.
| SYMBOL | RRL | EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE |
|---|---|---|
| None | 0 | |
| Minimal | < 1 millisieverts | |
| Low | 1-5 mSv | |
| Medium | 5-10 mSv | |
| High | >10 mSv |
Disclaimer
Status Of Recommendations Each pathway is designed to assist clinicians in situations when faced with a large array of possible diagnostic tests and examinations. However, it is recognised that diagnostic practice may differ from a particular pathway depending on local availability of equipment and expertise, as well as the experience of individual clinicians. Therefore each pathway is neither a rigid set of rules, nor a substitute for clinical assessment, and individual patient circumstances should always be considered.
Spotted an error or outdated info? Click to tell us.
Osteoporosis (Suspected)
Suspected osteoporosis
The diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on an assessment of bone mineral density
- Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and a consequent increase in the risk of fracture
- The World Health Organization (WHO) has designated the first decade of the 21st century, as the 'Decade of Bone and Joint Diseases' recognising the importance of osteoporosis as a public health issue
- The cost to Australian economy of osteoporosis is estimated to be $7.4 billion dollars per year
- Osteoporosis is often described as a 'silent disease', with the radiological prevalence of the disease far in excess of diagnosis and active treatment to prevent further bone loss and future fracture
- Risk factors associated with osteoporosis
- Family history - parent or sibling
- Early menopause
- Hypogonadism
- ≥3 months glucocorticoids (at prednisolone ≥7.5mg)
- Coeliac disease / malabsorption disorders
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Primary hyperparathyroidism
- Hyperthyroidism
- Chronic kidney or liver disease
- Androgen deprivation therapy
- Recurrent falls
- Breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors
- Treatment with antiepileptic medications
- Low body weight
- HIV and its treatment
- Major depression / SSRI treatment
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Multiple myeloma / monoclonal gammopathy
- Organ or bone marrow transplant
- There are various fracture risk calculators in existence. In Australia a locally developed calculator based on the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study can be found by following this link. Another commonly used tool is the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) which has been developed by WHO. The calculator for this can be found by following this link. The Garvan tool has been shown to be more accurate than the FRAX tool
- At any age, women are considered to have approximately double the risk of a fracture compared with men. However once a man sustains a fragility fracture his risk of a subsequent fracture is higher than that of an equivalent woman
- For T scores of -1.0, -2.0 and -3.0 the relative risk of fracture increases by a factor of 1.7, 3.4 and 6.8 respectively
Further Radiological Investigations in the Assessment of Bone Mineral Density
Peripheral DEXA - The use of these devices is increasing due to their ease of use and portability. However individual manufacturers have established their own guidelines that have not been validated in the assessment of bone mineral density in large randomised trials
Spinal Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) - QCT is the most accurate tool to measure bone density, being 2-3 times more sensitive than DEXA in detecting loss of bone mineral. It is the only technique allowing volumetric measurement of the trabecular interior of bone. A major clinical limitation is the radiation exposure when compared to DEXA, as well as cost and resources availability issues
Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) - Several large prospective cohort studies have clearly demonstrated that this modality can predict future fracture risk. , There are several potential advantages over DEXA including expense, portability and lack of ionizing radiation. However a recent large meta-analysis found the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal ultrasound low when compared to DEXA as the standard reference. Furthermore cost-effective analysis utilising QUS as a pre-screening tool prior to DEXA in postmenopausal women has failed to show a benefit
Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan
- The current "gold standard" for the diagnosis of osteoporosis ,
- DEXA is superior to other techniques for assessing BMD because of its ,
- Low precision error
- Low radiation dose and short scan time (approximately one-tenth of that of a standard chest radiograph)
- Capacity to measure multiple skeletal sites
- Limitations of DEXA include
- Hip replacement precludes measurement of hip BMD
- In the spine, degenerative disease cause falsely elevated results owing to features such as osteophytes and compression fractures
- Measurements of different DEXA machines may vary considerably for the same individual (it is important to have follow-up scans on the same machine if possible)
- Results are expressed as Z or T scores, defined as the number of standard deviations (SDs) from the age and sex matched control means (Z score) and from the mean value in a 30 year old (T score)
- The T score can be expressed as the following:
(measured BMD minus young adult BMD) / (young adult standard deviation) - When interpreting serial DEXA scans it is best to consider the bone density change over time (g/cm2) rather than T scores as T score calculations are age dependent
- Based on bone densitometry, measured by DEXA and the T score, the World Health Organization classifies the patients into three categories ,
- Normal bone density: T score greater than -1
- Osteopenia (low bone mass): T score between -1 and -2.5
- Osteoporosis: T score less than -2.5
- For information for consumers about DEXA InsideRadiology
Biochemical Investigations
Biochemical investigations
Biochemical investigations should be obtained to assess for secondary causes of loss in bone density (e.g. osteomalacia). If the patient is hospitalised as a result of the fracture then these investigations can be conducted as an inpatient. Depending on the clinical context the following tests can be requested:
- Full blood count
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
- Calcium
- Creatinine
- Liver function tests including total alkaline phosphatase and albumin
- Thyroid stimulating hormone
- Protein electrophoresis
- Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody or anti-endomysial antibody
- Parathyroid hormone
- 25-Hydroxy vitamin D
Secondary causes of loss in bone density can include:
- Hyperthyroidism
- Hyperparathyroidism
- Renal failure
- Hyper / hypocalciuria
- Coeliac disease
- Haematologic disorders
- Exogenous medications (e.g. phenytoin, glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, methotrexate, lithium, proton pump inhibitors)
- Androgen deprivation therapy
- Patients with a Z score less than 1.5 with risk factors should be evaluated for secondary causes of osteoporosis. The following biochemical investigations can be obtained depending on the clinical context ,
- Full blood count
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
- Calcium
- Creatinine
- Total alkaline phosphatase and albumin
- Thyroid stimulating hormone
- Protein electrophoresis
- Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody or anti-endomysial antibody
- Parathyroid hormone
- 25-hydroxy vitamin D
- Secondary causes of osteoporosis can include
- Hyperthyroidism
- Hyperparathyroidism
- Renal failure
- Hyper / hypocalcicuria
- Coeliac disease
- Hyperthyroidism
- Haematologic disorders
- Exogenous medications (e.g. phenytoin, glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, methotrexate, lithium, proton pump inhibitors)
- Androgen deprivation therapy
Osteoporosis Treatment
Treatment of osteoporosis
Several options exist for the treatment of proven osteoporosis
The general principles of treatment in osteoporosis centre around the following
- Address and correct any underlying conditions that may be contributing to the development and progression of osteoporosis (e.g. hypogonadism, myeloma, hyperparathyroidism, Cushing’s syndrome, etc)
- Despite limited evidence there should be a consideration of lifestyle aspects (e.g. encouraging weight-bearing exercise, dietary intake of calcium, cease smoking, evaluate and rectify possible causes of falls, etc)
- Osteoporosis specific pharmacotherapy
- Vitamin D and calcium supplementation if inadequate
- Falls prevention strategies
Osteoporosis Follow Up
Follow up
Follow up of patients with osteoporosis will vary and depend on a variety of factors like BMD level (and the need for subsequent repeat DEXA scans), medication regime, absolute fracture risk and patient factors
The following table contains recommended management and follow up depending on the BMD T score, risk factors and presence or absence of a minimal trauma fracture
|
T Score
|
Minimal Trauma Fracture
|
Risk Factors
|
Management / Recommendation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
≤ -2.5 |
Present |
One or more |
|
|
≤ -2.5 |
Absent |
One or more |
|
|
-1.0 to -2.5 |
Present |
One or more |
|
|
-1.0 to -2.5 |
Absent |
One or more |
|
|
≥-1.0 |
Absent |
Present |
|
|
≤-1.5 |
Absent |
Commencing glucocorticoids 7.5mg/day prednisolone or equivalent for at least 3 months. |
|
Conservative Management
Conservative management
Points to be addressed in those patients who do not have an indication for DEXA scan (absent risk factors) or whose scan result does not qualify them for osteoporotic treatment
- The following points should be addressed in those patients who do not have an indication for DEXA scan or whose scan result does not qualify them for osteoporotic treatment
- General lifestyle advice
- Advise to stop smoking and consume minimal alcohol
- Evaluate and rectify possible causes of falls
- Advocate a regular weight bearing or strengthening exercise program
- Exposure to indirect sunlight for 15 minutes, four to six times a week
- Ongoing monitoring for osteopenia/osteoporosis. Regularly monitor height as a loss of height of 2.5cm is a surrogate marker for osteoporosis. Plain radiographs of the spine should be considered for an asymptomatic vertebral fracture
Indications for DEXA
Indications for DEXA
The risk factors highlighted in blue currently attract a medicare rebate in Australia
- The main high risk groups for whom BMD measurement should be considered include
- Patients over 70 years of age
- Suspected vertebral fracture where fracture is confirmed then referral for DEXA should be made
- Patients with minimal trauma fracture
- Patients over 50 with the following risk factors
- Family history - parent or sibling
- Early menopause
- Hypogonadism
- ≥3 months glucocorticoids (at prednisone ≥7.5mg)
- Coeliac disease / malabsorption disorders
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Primary hyperparathyroidism
- Hyperthyroidism
- Chronic kidney or liver disease
- Androgen deprivation therapy
- Recurrent falls
- Breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors
- Treatment with antiepileptic medications
- Low body weight
- HIV and its treatment
- Major depression / SSRI treatment
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Multiple myeloma / monoclonal gammopathy
- Organ or bone marrow transplant
- Items above highlighted in blue currently have medicare rebates associated with them
- Guidelines or evidence based reviews on the indications for BMD testing have been published by many organisations. Those of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry for bone density testing are the most comprehensive and clinically useful
- Women Aged 65 years and older
- Postmenopausal women under age 65 with risk factors for osteoporosis
- Men aged 70 years and older
- Adults with fragility fracture
- Adults with disease or condition associated with low bone mass or bone loss
- Adults taking medication associated with low bone mass or bone loss
- Anyone being considered for pharmacological osteoporosis therapy
- Anyone being treated for low bone mass to monitor treatment effect
- Anyone not receiving therapy in whom evidence of bone loss would lead to treatment
- Women discontinuing estrogen therapy
Minimal trauma fracture
Minimal trauma fracture
Definitions can vary but generally minimal trauma fractures occur after relatively minor trauma. A common way to ascertain on history taking whether the fracture sustained is a minimal trauma fracture is to ask the patient if they would have expected a similar fracture to occur when they were in their 20’s. If the answer is unsure or no then it is recommended to presume a minimal trauma fracture
The three most common fracture locations associated with a minimal trauma fracture are vertebral fractures, fractures of the femoral neck and fractures of the distal radius (Colles fractures). Osteoporotic spinal compression fractures are diagnosed when there is loss of height in the anterior, middle, or posterior dimension of the vertebral body that exceeds 20 percent. Based on the vertebral height loss osteoporotic spine fractures can be classified as the following
- mild: 20-25 percent
- moderate: 25-40 percent
- Severe: >40 percent
Other causes for fracture
Other causes for fracture
Other pathological causes for fracture that should be considered if the relevant clinical history is present include conditions like Paget’s disease, benign bone tumours and cysts, myeloma / plasmacytoma, infection and primary and secondary malignant bone tumours
Categorising bone mineral density
Categorising bone mineral density
Based on bone densitometry, measured by DEXA and the T score, the World Health Organization classifies the patients into three categories:
- Normal bone density: T score greater than -1.
- Osteopaenia (low bone mass): T score between -1 and -2.5.
- Osteoporosis: T score less than -2.5
Risk factors
Risk factors
The risk factors highlighted in blue currently attract a medicare rebate in Australia
FRAX and Garvan risk calculators
FRAX and Garvan risk calculators
The FRAX and Garvan risk calculators have been developed to evaluate fracture risk in patients and are dependant on a variety of factors. Caution should be exercised when solely using risk calculators to make decisions in regards to initiation and more importantly withholding of treatment. The decision to treat should be made on a variety of clinical factors. Risk calculators can be of assistance to stratify / re-stratify patients into risk categories which can aid in determining frequency of clinical monitoring
The FRAX calculator uses the following parameters, as well as geographical region of the patient, to assess for fracture risk:
- Age
- Sex
- Weight
- Height
- Previous fracture
- Parent who has had a fracture hip
- Current smoking status
- Use of glucocorticoids
- Presence of rheumatoid arthritis
- Secondary causes of osteoporosis
- Alcohol consumption
- Femoral neck BMD (if available)
The Garvan calculator uses the following parameters to assess for fracture risk:
- Age
- Sex
- Number of fractures since the age of 50 (excluding major trauma)
- Falls in the past 12 months
- BMD measurement (if available)
- Weight
