Population Covered By The Guidance
This pathway provides guidance on the imaging of patients with acute sinusitis.
Lead Researcher: Manusha Ratnayake
Experts & Contributors: Experts & Contributors
Link to Clinical Advisors
Editorial Panel: Editorial Panel
Link to Editorial Panel
Date reviewed: July 2014
Date Published: October 2014
Pansinusitis with Preseptal Cellulitis and Septal Abscess
Pansinusitis with Preseptal Cellulitis and Septal Abscess
Pansinusitis with Preseptal Cellulitis and Septal Abscess
Pansinusitis with Preseptal Cellulitis and Septal Abscess
- Imaging is indicated in acute sinusitis if
- There is inadequate response to medical therapy
- There are numerous episodes of acute bacterial sinusitis in a year
- There is a clinical suspicion of intracranial or intraorbital complications
- The patient is immunocompromised
- A CT scan of the sinuses is the recommended imaging modality if indicated
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- McAlister WH, Strain JD, Cohen HL, et al. The American College of Radiology: ACR appropriateness criteria: sinusitis - child. 2012 [cited 2014 December 8]. (Guidelines). View the reference
- Fokkens W, Lund V, Bachert C, et al. EEACI Position paper on rhinosinusistis and nasal polyps: executive summary. Allergy. 2005:60:583-601. (Guidelines)
- European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Rhinology. 2005;18:S1-87. (Review article)
- Slavin RG, Spector SL, Bernstein IL, et al. The diagnosis and management of sinusitis: a practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:S13-47. (Review article)
- Lanza DC, Kennedy DW. Adult rhinosinusitis defined. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(3):S1-S7. (Review article)
- Brook I, Gooch WM 3rd, Reiner SA, et al. Medical management of acute bacterial Sinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109:1-17. (Clinical decision rule)
- Evans KL. Diagnosis and management of sinusitis. BMJ. 1994;309:1415-22. (Review article)
- Low DE, Desrosiers M, McSherry J. A practical guide for the diagnosis and treatment of acute sinusitis. CMAJ. 1997;156(6S):S1-14. (Review article)
- Yousem DM. Imaging of sinonasal inflammatory disease. Radiology. 1993;188:303-14. (Review article)
- Zinreich SJ. Rhinosinusitis: radiologic diagnosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997:117(3):S27-S34. (Review article)
- Gwaltney JM, Phillips CD, Miller RD, Riker DK. Computed tomographic study of the common cold. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:25-30. (Level IV evidence)
- Lindbaek M, Johnsen U, Kaastad E, et al. CT Findings in general practice patients with suspected acute sinusitis. Acta Radiologica. 1996;37:708-13. (Level IV evidence)
- Eustis HS, Mafee MF, Walton C, Mondonca J. MR imaging and CT of orbital infections and complications in acute rhinosinusitis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;36:1165-83. (Review article)
- Tack D, Widelec J, De Maertelaer V, Bailly J-M, Delcour C, Gevenois PA. Comparison between low-dose and standard-dose multidetector CT in patients with suspected chronic sinusitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:939-44. (Level III evidence)
- Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A. A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:976-80. (Level III evidence)
- Younis RT, Anand VK, Davidson B. The role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sinusitis with complications. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:224-9. (Level IV evidence)
- Hahnel S, Ertl_Wagner B, Tasman A-J, Forsting M, Jansen O. Relative value of MR imaging as compared with CT in the diagnosis of inflammatory paranasal sinus disease. Radiology. 1999;210:171-6. (Level IV evidence)
- Lee SK, Terbrugge KG. Cerebral venous thrombosis in adults: the role of imaging evaluation and management. Neuroimag Clin N Am. 2003;13:139-152. (Review article)
- Tsai FY, Wang AM, Matovich VB, et al. MR staging of acute dural sinus thrombosis: correlation with venous pressure measurements and implications for treatment and prognosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:1021-9. (Level III evidence)
- McAlister WH, Kronemer K. Imaging of sinusitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:1019-20. (Review article)
- Konen E, Faibel M, Kleinbaum Y, et al. The value of the occipitomental (waters') view in diagnosis of sinusitis: a comparative study with computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:856-60. (Level II/III evidence)
- Davidson TM, Brahme FJ, Gallagher ME. Radiographic evaluation for nasal dysfunction: computed tomography versus plain films. Head and Neck. 1989;11:405-9. (Level III evidence)
Pathway User Guide
Yellow Boxes Denotes extra information. Some contain single or multiple white sub-boxes, click a white box to reveal detailed information in a pop-up.
White Boxes: Denotes standard pathway steps. (If inside a yellow box, they open a specific pop-up).
Zoom & Pan Controls: Use + / − or the slider to zoom. Reset returns to default. Tick Panning to drag the diagram when zoomed.
Blue “View Full Screen” Button: Opens the whole diagram in a large, full-screen pop-up window. Use Close to exit.
The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.
| SYMBOL | RRL | EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE |
|---|---|---|
 |
None | 0 |
 |
Minimal | < 1 millisieverts |
 |
Low | 1-5 mSv |
 |
Medium | 5-10 mSv |
 |
High | >10 mSv |
Disclaimer
Status Of Recommendations Each pathway is designed to assist clinicians in situations when faced with a large array of possible diagnostic tests and examinations. However, it is recognised that diagnostic practice may differ from a particular pathway depending on local availability of equipment and expertise, as well as the experience of individual clinicians. Therefore each pathway is neither a rigid set of rules, nor a substitute for clinical assessment, and individual patient circumstances should always be considered.
Spotted an error or outdated info? Click to tell us.
Coronal Computed Tomography
Coronal Computed Tomography
The imaging method of choice for evaluating sinus disease and intraorbital complications. It provides essential anatomical detail for surgical planning
- Coronal CT is not a routine investigation in the diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis and is indicated only for non-responsive or recurrent acute sinusitis, pre-surgical planning and for evaluating suspected complications,,
- Coronal plane optimally displays,
- The ostiomeatal unit and relationship of the brain and roof of the ethmoid sinus
- The relationship of the orbits to the paranasal sinuses
- For patients requiring sinus imaging evaluation, consensus in North America and Europe currently recommends CT in preference to plain film radiography which are insensitive and non-specific
- There have been no studies comparing CT to sinus puncture and aspiration
- CT has low specificity for diagnosis of acute sinusitis, thus clinical correlation is essential
- Features of acute sinusitis on CT include: mucosal thickening, presence of air/fluid levels, enhancing pockets with non-enhanced central zone (pus) and complete sinus opacification,
- For anatomical evaluation including pre-surgical planning, a non-contrast scan is adequate
- If complications are suspected, then the scan is usually performed before and after administration of contrast
- Multidetector CT enables fast scan times, and may reduce the need for sedation in young children
- Low-dose CT protocols can effectively reduce the radiation dose without significantly affecting diagnostic quality,
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
More accurate than CT for assessing intracranial complications of acute sinusitis
- For intracranial complications of acute sinusitis, MRI is more accurate than CT and is considered by some to be the initial diagnostic modality of choice,
- MRI and MR Venography (MRV) are more sensitive than CT for the diagnosis of cavernous sinus thrombosis,
- Limitations: expensive, not available at all centres, long scan times